Search Central LiveDeep Dive Europe 2026

Knowledge base v2.13.0 · Community edition · data through 2 October 2026

Thing · Concept

Search quality raters

People who rate the quality of Google's results against published guidelines; their ratings test changes and do not rank pages.

ConceptAlso calledquality raters, quality rater, rater guidelines, Search Quality Rater Guidelines

Open in Reef mapOpen in Graph

Narrative see the topic Testing changes and quality raters

Claims
25
In Google’s docs
8
Said at the event
15
Not in docs
2
Kit items
5

Glossary · Search quality raters

External reviewers who rate results for changes Google is testing, following the Search Quality Rater Guidelines. They cannot affect individual sites' rankings, and nothing in their guidelines is itself a ranking factor.

Google’s documentation 8

Documented in

DocsSourceD2-C870

Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines define main content as any part of the page that directly helps it achieve its purpose, including text, images, videos, page features such as calculators and content created by users, and they count the title at the top of the page as part of it.

Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines (PDF, 11 September 2025) · Day 2 · Understanding what's on a page

DocsSourceD2-C871

Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines say navigation links are a common type of supplementary content, and that content behind tabs and user reviews or comments may count as main content on some pages and as supplementary content on others, depending on the page's purpose.

Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines (PDF, 11 September 2025) · Day 2 · Understanding what's on a page

DocsSourceD3-C156

Google's How Search Works page says that in a side-by-side experiment search quality raters see two sets of results, one with the proposed change and one without, and are asked which they prefer and why.

Google Search (How Search Works) · Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

DocsSourceD3-C176

Google's helpful-content guidance lists effort, originality, talent or skill and accuracy as the main-content attributes search quality raters are trained to evaluate, and says using generative AI to produce large amounts of text without manual oversight or curation represents little to no effort.

Google Search Central · Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

DocsSourceD3-C266

Google's 2019 post on core updates says Google tests any broad core update before it goes live, including feedback from its search quality raters, whose data is not used directly in ranking.

Search Central blog (1 August 2019) · Day 3 · What are quality updates

DocsSourceD3-C710

Google's Search Quality Rater Guidelines (September 2025) list fake owner or content creator profiles, such as made-up author profiles with AI-generated images, as deception, and say pages using deception of any type should be rated Lowest.

Google Search Quality Rater Guidelines (PDF, 11 September 2025) · Day 3 · Wrapping all up: AI, Search, and making sense of everything.

Said at the event 15

Slide and stage claims that name it, the ones Google’s documentation does not cover first.

Not in docs 2

Consistent with docs 3

StageConsistent with docsD3-C168

Google's quality talk stressed that nothing in the Search Quality Rater Guidelines is itself a ranking factor; the guidelines explain how Google thinks about quality.

Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

Confirmed by docs 10

SlideConfirmed by docsD3-C158

Google's slide pointed to the Search Quality Rater Guidelines at goo.gle/raters-guidelines, with a QR code to the guidelines PDF, and the speaker said this is the exact document Google's raters use.

Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

SlideConfirmed by docsD3-C162

The rater guidelines' table of contents shown on Google's slide covers page quality rating, YMYL topics, main and supplementary content, website and creator reputation, E-E-A-T and lowest quality pages.

Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

StageConfirmed by docsD3-C170

Google's quality talk pointed to page 21 of the Search Quality Rater Guidelines for its definition of content quality by effort, originality, talent or skill and accuracy, noting that the document is updated from time to time.

Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

StageConfirmed by docsD3-C171

Google's quality talk said effort, in the rater guidelines, is the extent to which a human being actively worked to create satisfying content, and that effort can be direct or indirect.

Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

Press and analysis 2

AnalysisD3-C169

Use the rater guidelines as a description of what Google's ranking systems aim to reward, not as a checklist of ranking factors: rater scores evaluate Google's changes and are not used to rank any particular site.

Ibrahim Anjro · Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

AnalysisD3-C173

The talk's originality test ('are you adding more value') matches Google's helpful-content question on content that draws on other sources, while the rater guidelines ask raters, where other websites have similar content, to consider whether the page is the original source; aim to be the original source, and add substantial value where you build on others.

Ibrahim Anjro · Day 3 · How Google thinks about Quality

Built on these claims 5

Kit items about Search quality raters: their own words name it, or several of the claims they rest on do.

Developer requirements 2

Also inglossary terms Search quality raters, Content quality (effort, originality, talent or skill, accuracy), E-E-A-T

Connected things 3

Most often named with it

Things named in the same claim, with the number of claims they share.

Topics that feature it