Google says users like AI Overviews and search more because of them, with early feedback overwhelmingly positive and satisfaction highest among 18–24 year olds.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence slide photo, transcript
Knowledge base v2.13.0 · Community edition · data through 2 October 2026
Verification
Every slide and stage claim was checked against Google’s documentation. These are the ones the documentation does not cover: the most valuable claims, and the most fragile.
How to quote these
A claim marked Not in docs was said or shown at the event, by Google or a community speaker, but is not in Google’s published documentation. Quote it as “said at Search Central Live Deep Dive 2026”, never as documented policy.
Where the event and the documentation say different things, the differences ledger puts both side by side and says what to follow.
Google says users like AI Overviews and search more because of them, with early feedback overwhelmingly positive and satisfaction highest among 18–24 year olds.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google says AI Overviews help with new types of questions and lead users to visit a greater diversity of sites, with more total sites shown on the results page.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google says 94% of frequent LLM users are also frequent users of Google Search, as evidence that AI is growing search use rather than replacing it.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google says 71% of shoppers coming to Google Search agree they are open to trying new brands or products (the slide footnote cites a Google-commissioned Ipsos global consumer survey), and that people use Search to figure out what they want, not only to find what they already know.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence slide photo, transcript
The keynote cited Google CEO Sundar Pichai as saying Google is the biggest contributor of clicks to the open web and wants to remain so.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
Google said that even the classic ten-blue-links layout was settled only after millions of experiments, as part of using as much data as possible for product decisions.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
Google said that after the launch of Nano Banana, its image generation model, the Gemini app became the number one app in the app store in 2025.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
Google said it offers users a choice between AI Mode, AI Overviews and traditional search rather than focusing on one experience.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
Google said 18 to 24 year olds are more engaged than ever with the AI-powered features in Search: they requery and ask more, and more complex, questions, which leads to more searches.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
Google said its searches are growing year on year in both commercial and non-commercial queries.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
Google said 77% of users of AI Overviews and AI Mode are able to make decisions faster because of them.
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
The keynote added that people who also use a standalone LLM keep certain types of use anchored on Google (the example given is unclear in both recordings).
Speaker Lino CattaruzziEvidence transcript
AI Mode queries have doubled every quarter since launch.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo
The average AI Mode query is about 3 times the length of a traditional search (the opening keynote's slide and its speaker said two to three times).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence 2 slide photos, transcript
Used byglossary term AI Mode
One in six AI Mode searches is multimodal, using voice or images.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo
Follow-up queries in AI Mode have grown by more than 40% per month on average in the US since launch.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo
Used byglossary term AI Mode
Google describes four new ways people search in AI Mode: Explore (brainstorming queries, grown 30% faster than AI Mode queries overall in the US since launch), Learn (study guides, deep dives), Decide (searches beginning with 'which', up 40% faster than AI Mode queries overall in the past six months) and Do (planning queries, up 80% faster than AI Mode queries overall in the past six months).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence 2 slide photos, transcript
Queries of five or more words are growing in volume 1.5 times faster than shorter queries. The slide footnote cites Google internal data on global English-language queries, for a comparison period that starts in November 2022 (the remaining dates are only partly legible).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo
Search Agents in AI Mode let users set standing requests for updates, such as being told when a product goes on sale, a team wins or a price drops below a level.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google listed eight ways AI Search helps users find and visit websites: preferred sources expansion, fresh perspectives and prominent links, subscription content, in-line quotes in AI Mode and AI Overviews, rich linking and embedded web, context on content sources, 'Highly Cited' labels and Search profiles.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Users can link their subscriptions so answers highlight paywalled content they already pay for; The Indian Express saw 34% more engagement among linked subscribers.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Sites that users mark as a preferred source are more visible in Top Stories and are labelled in AI Mode and AI Overviews.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google said Gen Z users are a very large part of Google Search's user base and search differently from older users, for example with images.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google said it noticed young users uploading pictures to reverse image search and expecting results that answer something about the picture, and that Google Lens was its answer to that behaviour.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Google Lens
Google said Search agents in AI Mode had launched globally a day or two before 30 September 2026.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Search agents (information agents)
Gary Illyes said searching by image or by video, as Search offers it today, was not possible before transformers were invented.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Statistical models have been used at Google for over 20 years, for catching spam and originally for the 'Did you mean' feature.
Speaker Cherry Prommawin, Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
MUM (Multitask Unified Model) understands information across text, images, audio and video, and processes information in more than 75 languages.
Speaker Cherry Prommawin, Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo
Ranking signals differ by result type: web pages (text, links, passages), images (resolution, colour, associated text), news (freshness, originality, diversity), local (location, type, rating, reviews, hours) and videos (language, text from speech).
Speaker Cherry Prommawin, Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's answer was that ML-based ranking systems are trained on content written by humans for humans, so they understand and promote natural content better.
“ML based ranking algorithms and signals are trained on content by humans for humans. They "understand" and promote natural content better.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Cherry Prommawin, Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google said there are trillions of URLs on the internet, or even more, that even Google cannot tell how many exist, and that some may never be discovered.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
Google said its index, printed on paper, would reach the Moon and back twelve times.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
Google said the more important documents in its index naturally tend to be documents created by humans.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google said the natural content its ranking algorithms understand and promote better includes content created by humans or at least edited and reviewed by them.
“content that was created by humans, or at least edited and reviewed”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google said a majority of its search features now use AI.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
For visual search, Google breaks an image down into vectors, sends the vectors to the index and returns results based on them.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
A community speaker said schema markup helps AI agents interpret a page: on a product page, marking up which number is the price saves the agent from guessing.
Speaker Carlos OrtegaEvidence transcript
A community speaker said a third-party study from early 2026 found that websites with JSON-LD were shown much more often, and that the industry reacted by adding schema markup everywhere.
Speaker Thiago PojdaEvidence transcript
A community speaker said a later controlled study, which added schema markup to pages that lacked it and kept everything else unchanged, found only a negative correlation: the markup had been a sign of teams doing everything else right, not a cause.
Speaker Thiago PojdaEvidence transcript
A community speaker cited a third-party study (heard as Peec AI's) finding that 43% of prompts produced fan-out queries in a language other than the one the user searched in.
Speaker Thiago PojdaEvidence transcript
A community speaker showed a Spanish-language AI prompt about places to eat in Barcelona whose fan-out queries were all in English, so the content used to answer may be written by and for a different audience than the one asking.
Speaker Thiago PojdaEvidence transcript
A community speaker said Microsoft is ahead of Google in giving site owners the grounding queries its AI uses.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
A URL states how a resource is requested (the protocol, HTTP or HTTPS), where (the host, meaning which computer on the network) and what (the path to the exact page or file).
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
AI agents are, technically, the same thing as crawlers: HTTP clients that accomplish something on behalf of a user or a service.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google runs probably hundreds, if not thousands, of crawlers on its crawler infrastructure; some of them are named and some are not.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
The scheduler hands the crawler an ordered list of URLs from the crawl queue, and the crawler works through the list from top to bottom.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Crawl scheduler
Crawling for Gemini may be set to care less about quality and more about the amount of content, because for large language models the number of tokens matters more than quality.
“the number of tokens is actually more important”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google described its crawling as a large-scale distributed swarm of simple HTTP clients, roughly what one would get by deploying many wget or curl libraries on cloud compute instances.
“a large-scale distributed swarm of simple HTTP clients”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
1xx informational status codes, which only say that a request was received and more data is coming, have no meaning of their own for crawling.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
Most network errors happen somewhere between the site's origin server and Google's data centers, where they are invisible to both Google and the site owner; the way TCP networks work leaves no way to see what went wrong there.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SRV-01
Google has seen an uptick in 402 Payment Required responses to its crawlers, an even more recent trend than the rise in 403 responses.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SRV-09
Bing closes the robots.txt group at an unknown line placed between two user-agent lines, so in the slide's example bingbot ends up not blocked while Googlebot is; the slide warned that different crawlers behave differently.
“Unpredictability is never a good time.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker GoogleEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SRV-06
The robots.txt talk pointed to the robots.txt file of thebestfriedchickenever.com to show why comments in robots.txt are useful; the live file is mostly a large ASCII-art drawing written as # comment lines, followed by a single user-agent group (checked 2026-10-04).
Speaker GoogleEvidence notes, transcript
Other companies have similar 'extended' robots.txt tokens; Google named Apple's Applebot-Extended.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-05
Google called robots.txt extremely forgiving: a typo in a path only blocks the wrong path, a typo in a rule name such as disallow makes Google ignore that line, and the rest of the file is still used.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SRV-05
The real trouble is an unknown line placed between two user-agent lines: while writing RFC 9309, Google asked people whether the first crawler should then inherit the rules that follow, and opinions split roughly 50-50 (how the talk said the question was settled is unclear in the recording).
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SRV-06
Google said the robots.txt report helps catch CDNs that update a site's robots.txt without the owner's knowledge, and hosts that cloak the robots.txt file, which happens more often than people think.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SRV-06
Google said the robots.txt report uses the parser Google open-sourced at github.com/google/robotstxt.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term robots.txt report
Dave Smart said robots.txt is checked for every URL in a redirect chain and crawling stops at the first blocked one; in his example a site redirected through /cart/ with JavaScript to set the local currency and back, and because /cart/ was disallowed the page was reported as blocked.
Speaker Dave SmartEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-CAN-11glossary term Redirect chain
Dave Smart said this applies to all redirects, not only JavaScript ones; his examples: a redirect through an external authorisation service that is blocked by its own robots.txt, content that moved through several URLs over the years with one of them later blocked, and unexpected redirects, such as one served only to Googlebot's user agent.
Speaker Dave SmartEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-CAN-11
If the quality or popularity of a URL is unknown, the aggregate quality or popularity of its parent path is used, then that path's parent, and so on.
“If quality or popularity is unknown, use parent root's aggregate quality or popularity is used, then, that path's parent's, and so on.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-URL-10
The quality that drives crawl demand is the quality of the site as a whole, not the quality of an individual page.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
Similar URLs usually come from programming errors or manually set links, but anyone can link to them from other sites, including malicious actors, so a site should be hardened against them.
Speaker Tobias SchwarzEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-URL-11
A community speaker said that more than half of internet traffic in the previous year (2025) was non-human; the source of the figure was not named.
Speaker Jovana AvramovicEvidence transcript
A community speaker cited more than 900 million weekly active ChatGPT users and 2.5 billion monthly users of a Google AI feature (the recording is unclear which), adding that these are not comparable market-share figures.
Speaker Jovana AvramovicEvidence transcript
A community speaker linked the serial-position effect in human memory (people best remember the first and last items of a list) to the 'lost in the middle' pattern that research has found in large language models.
Speaker Jovana AvramovicEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Lost in the middle
Crawling for AI model training differs from search crawling because training mainly needs a very large number of tokens, and it matters little which pages they come from.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-05
A Google panelist said they were working on a set of crawler best practices and offering research, malware-scanning and privacy crawlers an exemption from following them, apparently because such crawlers sometimes need to ignore robots.txt or probe URLs that other crawlers would not touch (the reason is a best reading: the audio has 'don't need', which would not explain an exemption).
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Log files alone cannot show crawl inefficiency because they do not reveal where Google's crawl limit for the site lies; many similar URLs being crawled may not matter if the site is nowhere near that limit.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-04
Many crawling complaints that reach Google's crawling team turn out to be caused by a plugin, for example a WordPress calendar plugin that adds calendar parameters to the URLs of every post, page, category and tag page.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-URL-08
To check that new content is crawled fast enough, Gary Illyes advised measuring the time between publishing a URL and Googlebot's first crawl of it: ideally it stays flat or falls, and only a rising trend calls for investigation.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-11
The first priority in Google's own site consolidation was to identify the popular URLs people care about and make sure the migration did not damage them.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
A Google panelist said Apple offers a robots.txt control for Applebot similar to Google-Extended, so a site can allow Applebot for search while opting out of Apple's AI use.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-05
When logs show an unknown crawler fetching a lot, search for its user agent online to find the robots.txt token that controls it; the mainstream crawlers that send the most traffic can all be controlled this way.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-05
A Google panelist said, as a fun fact, that JavaScript was used for the language-consolidation redirects in Google's own site migration, because it was the only option available to the person doing it (the recording does not make fully clear whether the JavaScript performed the redirects or built the mapping).
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-CAN-01
Gary Illyes said that if the time from publishing to Googlebot's first crawl starts rising, how much it rises matters: for the crawling of fresh stories, something like two hours is probably not great (a smaller example figure is unclear in the recording).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-11
Check and focus on rich results for Google.
Evidence notes
Google answered on a Q&A slide that good HTML sitemaps are hard to make for large sites.
“It's hard to make good HTML sitemaps for large sites.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Gary Illyes, Cherry PrommawinEvidence slide photo
Google answered on a Q&A slide that whether to keep a temporarily out-of-stock product page or redirect it depends on how important that product page is to users.
“It depends on the importance of the PDPs to the users.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Gary Illyes, Cherry PrommawinEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-ERR-04
Google answered on a Q&A slide that it does not treat a robots.txt disallow as a noindex because some extremely important sites disallow their most important pages, by accident or out of ignorance.
“Simply put, it's because of sites that are extremely important and like to disallow their most important pages, either accidentally or out of ignorance.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Gary Illyes, Cherry PrommawinEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-01
Google contrasted out-of-stock products a buyer will wait for, such as a rare watch battery that matters to them, with easily replaced products, such as a particular cheese, for which the buyer simply picks a similar product instead of waiting.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Google illustrated why it does not treat a robots.txt disallow as noindex with an extremely important site, such as a national tax authority, that blocks very important PDF files with robots.txt: Google cannot index the PDFs' content but can at least show their URLs in search results.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-01
Google said very few URLs disallowed by robots.txt are in its index, compared with the index as a whole (no figure given).
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-01
A Google slide titled Data from Crawling showed an example of what the crawler passes on for processing: the fetch result, the connect time and the time to first byte in milliseconds, the robots policies that apply to the fetch, and the raw HTTP response with the page's HTML.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence slide photo
Used byrequirement DEV-PRF-01
The HTML parsing step turns a fetched page's HTML into a Document Object Model (DOM) tree of elements, attributes and text nodes.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence slide photo
Used byrequirement DEV-HTM-05
The speaker said Google sometimes also extracts URLs that are typed out as plain text on a page without being hyperlinked; the remarks around this point were unclear in the recording.
Speaker Cherry PrommawinEvidence transcript
A slide named internal admin pages, temporary landing pages and thin content as typical use cases for the noindex rule.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo
John Mueller said AI crawlers do not really know what to do with nofollow links, because they look at the content rather than building a link graph; he did not say whether he meant Google's AI systems, other AI crawlers or both.
“AI crawlers don't really know what to do with a nofollow link, because they're looking at the content”
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
A max-snippet value too short for a useful snippet may lead Google to show no snippet at all, John Mueller said.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-05
max-snippet:-1 removes the length limit and can produce a longer snippet than having no rule, because by default Google keeps snippets to a length it considers reasonable instead of quoting a page at length.
“max-snippet:-1 = No limit. (can be more than without)”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
John Mueller said Google Search does not always show an image thumbnail for a result, and when it does, the thumbnail is usually limited to the size of the result entry.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
John Mueller's slide said Search Console has very few indexing-like settings and listed the Search generative AI control as the one control in his talk that is not a meta tag.
“Very few "indexing-like" settings are in Search Console”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
Compared with other search engines and AI crawlers, Google said its effort to mimic what the user sees is essential to keeping its knowledge of the web up to date and comprehensive; it did not say what the others do.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Being able to render and read JavaScript matters whether the client fetching a page is a search crawler or an AI system, Google said.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Google described the mission of its rendering as simply executing JavaScript, while the implementation is complex, expensive and difficult.
“our mission is very simple these days: execute JavaScript”
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
To train Gemini models, Google renders every page just as it does for Search, so a page that renders correctly for Search also works for Gemini training, provided the site allows its content to be used for training.
“if it works for Search, it works for Gemini for training”
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-11
When a Gemini user asks about a specific web page (for example, whether it says anything about the ruby HTML tag), the page is read at that moment rather than during crawling and may be used to ground the answer, which takes extra time.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-PRF-02
After the crawler has fetched a page, Google's rendering system executes it, checks that it loads properly and works out what it looks like at different sizes.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Google said its pipeline needs to ensure that content indexable without JavaScript can pass through without rendering, while content that appears only through JavaScript and CSS takes a longer rendering pass.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Switching JavaScript off and on in the browser gives a quick first impression of which content on a page depends on rendering.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Offer counts, discounts and other data should always be the same in the raw HTML and the rendered page, a community speaker advised.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-07
A search engine's renderer does not wait forever before taking its snapshot, so content from slow internal systems or APIs can be missing and unresolved placeholders can end up in the final snapshot, a community speaker said.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-06
Unresolved placeholders caused by rendering timeouts are hard to catch because the problem moves around: it is not always the same page that is broken.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirements DEV-MON-05, DEV-REN-06
To catch intermittent rendering problems, archive the full HTML and the resources of each page during a site audit and analyse them yourself, a community speaker advised.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-05
Content Security Policy lowers the risk of cross-site scripting and clickjacking by defining trusted hosts; a resource from a host that is not trusted is not used.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-09
A page can render completely blank while its raw HTML looks fine, so a team checking only the raw HTML thinks all is well; causes include server misconfiguration, overload and bad scripts.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-05
A community speaker strongly advised SEOs to use Chrome DevTools more often to understand what happens when their pages render.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Third-party systems billed per session that also run when bots render a page can cost a high-traffic site thousands of euros per month, a community speaker said, adding that he sees this regularly.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-PRF-03
A community speaker's slide put the usual wait in Google's render queue at seconds to a couple of minutes per page.
“Usually from seconds to a couple minutes.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Rebecca YuEvidence slide photo
If a page keeps loading content indefinitely, not all of that content will be indexed, because Google's rendering does not go on forever (this passage of the recording is partly unclear).
Speaker Rebecca YuEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-06
If content is missing from the rendered HTML, find the script responsible in Chrome DevTools: open the Network tab, filter by Fetch/XHR and reload the page.
Speaker Rebecca YuEvidence transcript
If the cause of missing JavaScript content is still unclear after checking the network requests, search the source code for a string related to the missing content.
Speaker Rebecca YuEvidence transcript
Natalia Venditto named three typical failure modes by which an embedded app can break the application hosting it: collisions in the global JavaScript scope and module registry, CSS bleed, and fate sharing.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
CSS bleed, as Natalia Venditto described it, means styles leak between an embedded app and its host, so that suddenly everything looks like the embedded app or the embedded app takes on the look of the host.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Fate sharing means a failure in an embedded app spreads to its host, for example an unhandled exception in the embedded app that ends up breaking the host application.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
An iframe, the long-established way to embed an app, isolates both JavaScript and styles but is not part of the page: it is walled off from the host's DOM, navigation and layout, which Natalia Venditto said brings many problems with accessibility, layout and navigation.
“Walled off from DOM, navigation, layout”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence slide photo, transcript
Shadow DOM isolates styles and keeps the embedded content part of the page, but it does not isolate JavaScript: the embedded code still shares the host's JavaScript globals.
“Still shares JS globals”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byglossary term Shadow DOM
Rewriting everything into one application keeps the result part of the page, but JavaScript and style isolation then have to be done by hand.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence slide photo, transcript
Reframing with Web Fragments was the only approach on the comparison slide ticked for all three criteria (JavaScript isolated, styles isolated, part of the page); its stated catch is that it relies on browser patches today.
“Needs patches today”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence slide photo, transcript
Web Fragments is a lightweight library that puts a hidden iframe in the host page and uses it as an isolated sandbox to run the embedded app's JavaScript, not to render the app.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Web Fragments fetches the embedded app's assets from a remote endpoint through middleware that acts as a gateway.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Web Fragments reframes the embedded app's DOM by placing it inside a shadow DOM in the host page, while the app's JavaScript runs in the hidden iframe.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
With Web Fragments the page ends up as a single document in which the host application does not know the embedded app runs inside it and the embedded app does not know it lives in another document.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Web Fragments monkey-patches browser APIs to containerize the browser, recreating inside it an architecture similar to Docker containers on the back end.
“we monkey patch the browser to containerize it”
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
The browser APIs Web Fragments patches include document, history and location; Natalia Venditto said they are virtualized rather than hijacked, so controls work exactly as in a normal application.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Web Fragments retargets dispatchEvent calls to the fragment's shadow root and resolves DOM calls such as appendChild and element lookups against the main document.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Natalia Venditto said Web Fragments suits AI-generated apps because a web fragment used as a custom element sandboxes the app's rendering, avoiding collisions and CSS bleed between the app and its host in either direction.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
A slide set out Web Fragments in five steps: an LLM writes the app and adds a custom element such as <web-fragment fragment-id="some-id"> to the HTML, a standalone HTTP endpoint is set up, the library is imported and initialized with initializeWebFragments(), the fragment is registered in the gateway, and step 5 is a celebration emoji.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence slide photo, transcript
Natalia Venditto said the five Web Fragments steps are all that is needed to run a containerized application fully on the client side.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
A web fragment is served from its own standalone HTTP endpoint, so the embedded app can be deployed anywhere, separately from the host page.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence slide photo, transcript
Natalia Venditto said Web Fragments is framework-agnostic and vendor-agnostic and works the same whatever JavaScript framework the embedded app uses.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Natalia Venditto reported an enormous performance increase (no figure given) when an application is reframed inside a fully client-side host, because the reframed app is rendered and interactive immediately.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Natalia Venditto said a server-rendered app reframed into the host page is fully indexable.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-01
Natalia Venditto said ShadowRealm, a JavaScript standard proposal, was at stage 2.7 at the time of the talk, which she glossed as meaning that only implementation is missing.
“the only thing missing is implementation”
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Natalia Venditto said the ShadowRealm proposal would do much of what Web Fragments does today with patches: containerizing and isolating execution.
Speaker Natalia VendittoEvidence transcript
Search engines such as Google and Bing would ignore HTML tags written inside a meta description, a community speaker said.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-HTM-03
Besides using Chrome DevTools more often, a community speaker advised checking rendering at scale with a modern crawler.
Speaker Sören BendigEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-05
Google's slide called content missing from the rendered HTML the most common JavaScript issue for indexing.
“The most common issue.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-02
Content is missing from the rendered HTML either because the server does not serve it or because the content has still not appeared after some period of time.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-06
Instead of scrolling, Google renders a page in a very tall viewport, around 10,000 pixels high.
“it renders it in a very tall viewport. Specifically, around 10,000 pixels is what the viewport gets rendered as.”
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirements DEV-REN-03, DEV-URL-07glossary term Viewport expansion
Polyfills work in two directions: they patch backwards where a browser lacks support, or patch forward to build now for a feature expected in the future, as Web Fragments does.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Erin Sparling called URL fragments (the part of a URL after #) the next most common JavaScript issue seen, after rendering problems and blocked rendering.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Real URLs also work as deep links: Android, iOS and desktop operating systems accept full URLs as keys to specific content in an app, so clean URLs simplify the cross-platform user experience, not only indexing.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-URL-03
A headless content management system serves its content as an API; even WordPress, often seen as one monolithic application, can be used headless, with only its editor or only its renderer.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Combining schema-based interfaces with web standards such as WebMCP lets a site expose tools to AI agents, which can then operate the interfaces, for example to test them.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Erin Sparling showed a Search Console result saying a URL would be indexed only under certain conditions, one of which had not been met, and contrasted it with the result for an available URL whose content loads.
Speaker Erin SparlingEvidence transcript
Words in the footer of a page get a lower weight, so text placed in the footer is unlikely to contribute much to ranking the page.
“if you put something in a footer, it's more likely that it's not going to contribute much to ranking”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-HTM-02
Gary Illyes said not everything on a page can or should be important: if everything were placed in the main content, nothing would stand out as main content, which he called working as intended.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google does not store the complete sentences or the full HTML of a page in the Search index, because large pieces of text would be unsearchable; it tokenizes the text into the smallest segments that still allow search.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byglossary term Tokenization
For languages written with spaces between words, such as English and German, Search tokenization splits a sentence into its individual words.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Text in languages written without spaces, such as Thai and Chinese, would end up in the index as long strings that might never be searched for, so Google segments it into words with statistical models built from other web content in that language.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
For languages written without spaces, such as Thai and Chinese, Google uses exactly the same word segmentation when indexing a page as when interpreting the user's query, because otherwise the query could not be matched against the index.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
When tokenizing for Search, Google attaches metadata to each token for use in ranking, such as whether the word appeared in the header or in the main content (tagged 'centerpiece' on the slide), in bold or in a heading; Gary Illyes said he was not showing all of the metadata.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-HTM-07
Google also stores spam metadata with the tokens of a page, for example that text was white on a white background, so ranking can use that information.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-HTM-06
Tokenization for AI models such as Gemini, in training and in inference, differs from tokenization for Search, although Gary Illyes qualified this with 'or mostly'.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's two tokenization slides showed the difference on the same sentence: the Search tokenizer kept 'robots.txt' and 'tl;dr' as single tokens, while the AI-model tokenizer split them into pieces such as 'tl' and 'dr' or 'robots' and 'txt', with the punctuation as separate tokens.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence 2 slide photos
Gary Illyes added that, once chunk size is thought of in millions of tokens as Gemini's context window allows, chunking has perhaps lost its meaning anyway.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-03
Because error pages are worded in endless variations, of which 'page not found' is only the classic one, Google cannot detect soft 404s with simple error, word or keyword matching.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Mistakes in Google's own systems are a further cause of soft 404s, and Gary Illyes asked site owners to report such mistakes in Google's forums.
“BONUS: Mistakes in Google's systems (that you should notify us about)”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google detects soft 404s with a language model, described as something like BERT, that is trained to understand the structure and layout of a page as well as its language, instead of reading the page as one flat wall of text.
“This is basically an LLM thing, something like BERT, that is specifically trained to understand page structure”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
For soft 404 detection, the position of error text decides: an error in a less important part such as the navigation need not make a page a soft 404, but an error message alone in the main content, like 'Error establishing a database connection', does, much as a human would judge it.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-ERR-03
Google's soft 404 detection tells the page chrome, such as navigation and footer, apart from the main content by analysing the page's visual hierarchy alongside its text.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Storage is a second reason for deduplication: Google's storage has many competing uses and storage prices have risen sharply, so the space for any one use is limited and Google has to draw a line somewhere.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google clusters duplicate pages by content in four ways: exact matches, near matches, structurally similar content, and soft 404s.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google sometimes picks a canonical that looks unrelated because it recognised a URL pattern: if /buy/fax, /buy/typewriter and /office-equipment show the same content, its systems may assume any /buy/ URL, even /buy/seo-service, shows that same office-equipment content without looking at the page.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirements DEV-CAN-08, DEV-URL-09
Google's slide on structurally similar content asked whether a new URL that fits a known duplicate pattern, such as /buy/seo-service, even needs to be crawled.
“Do we even need to crawl /buy/seo-service ?”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo
Used byrequirements DEV-CAN-08, DEV-URL-09
City pages can trigger the same pattern-based deduplication: for a car dealer brand with branches in several cities and similar stock, Google's systems may decide the city name does not matter and canonicalise to one city's page; the slide asked whether a further city page such as /zurich/services would be treated the same way.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-CAN-08
AI agents that browse the web for users run into the same bot walls that sites put up against scrapers, and may give up and go to another site, for example to buy the product elsewhere.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-04
Google picks the canonical from a variety of criteria and uses some kind of machine learning to decide how much weight each criterion gets; the weighting changes from time to time.
“we use some kind of machine learning to understand how strong these criteria should be. And this changes from time to time.”
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google's speaker said that pointing rel=canonical from the pages of a paginated set to the first page can sometimes make sense depending on the goal, for example to make a category page more visible, but that it affects canonicalization and deduplication.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-URL-06
Google's duplication talk closed with the advice not to block agents, which the speaker said are sometimes really cool.
“Don't block agents.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-04
Google's speaker suggested checking rel=canonical links with a crawler such as Screaming Frog to make sure they are reasonable.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-06
Canonical chains can run through canonical links alone, through a server-side redirect between members, or through a client-side redirect between members.
Speaker Tobias SchwarzEvidence transcript
Canonical loops, such as two HTML pages whose canonical tags point to each other, are a structural conflict: the group has no canonical leader, so its canonical information cannot be used.
Speaker Tobias SchwarzEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-CAN-04glossary term Canonical chain and canonical loop
Canonical loops can also run through server-side or client-side redirects, not only through canonical tags.
Speaker Tobias SchwarzEvidence transcript
A community speaker said that at best a search engine's heuristic would treat a canonical loop through redirects as self-referencing canonicals, and doubted that this is often done when the loop runs through a client-side redirect.
“But regarding the client-side redirect, I highly doubt that this is often done.”
Speaker Tobias SchwarzEvidence transcript
A community speaker said pages carry different link equity, and a canonical leader that is not the strongest page in its group is technically valid but most likely suboptimal for ranking, so the strongest page should be the leader.
Speaker Tobias SchwarzEvidence transcript
Google's indexing pipeline slide put a Processing stage between the crawler and the index and listed HTML parsing, rendering, deduplication and feature extraction above it, with feature extraction highlighted as the step of this talk.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's indexing pipeline slide drew a feedback line from the Processing stage back to the crawl queue.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo
Google's indexing includes a dedicated system, whose internal name Gary Illyes would not disclose, that extracts the parts of a page that are traditionally expensive to extract.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google runs deduplication before feature extraction, so that the expensive extraction work is spent only on a trimmed-down, manageable set of documents.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript, slide photo
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-10
Gary Illyes said feature extraction, which extracts page structures into a form Google's systems can consume internally, is still expensive, though not the most expensive operation.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
AI Overviews and AI Mode launched as fairly text-heavy answers with little image content and few tables, and they have become more structured over time because that is what users want.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Google gave four reasons why structured data is still valuable even though models can extract information from pages: precision, extra content, efficiency and focus.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo, transcript
Structured data gives the high precision that complex schemas such as sale pricing need, with higher accuracy than large-scale extraction by large language models (LLMs).
“Structured data provides the high precision needed for complex schema (sale pricing), achieving higher accuracy than large-scale LLM extraction.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo, transcript
In the speaker's own tests, even the latest LLMs asked to generate schema.org markup for a page often invent properties that do not exist, get deeply nested schemas such as complex pricing models wrong, and duplicate content across several fields.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-11
Automatic LLM extraction of structured information makes a great demo but is not yet good enough for extraction that aims at something like 99.9% accuracy, the speaker said.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Structured data often carries non-visible metadata that the page text lacks, such as full ISO dates or stable identifiers for user-generated content.
“It often contains non-visible metadata, such as full ISO dates or stable identifiers for UGC, that is not present in the page text.”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirements DEV-SDA-04, DEV-SDA-05
Google's own extraction systems focus heavily on what is visible on a page, which improves precision but means they can miss content or interpret it incorrectly.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Parsing structured data is significantly cheaper and more efficient than relying on LLMs for every complex extraction task.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo, transcript
Even Google cannot afford to run complex AI models on every page in its index, and distilling them into cheaper models makes them less precise.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Rule-based parsing of markup is nearly free by comparison with AI models, so Google will always prefer extracting information from structured data over model-based extraction.
“So we're always going to prefer that particular approach.”
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Structured data explicitly points to the pertinent data on a page, which reduces noise and stops Google's systems from pulling in extraneous information such as prices of related products.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-07
Google's systems sometimes fail to determine a page's main content correctly, and structured data helps because site owners tend to mark up what is actually important rather than boilerplate or ads.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-07
As far as the speaker knows, in most of Google's main AI uses a page's schema.org markup is not turned into text and put directly into the model's context; the data is first sorted out, checked for quality and indexed before it is passed on as grounding context.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
The speaker said there are concerns that feeding raw schema.org markup straight into an AI model's context would be a big abuse vector, one reason Google does not do so.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Microdata has an advantage when payload size matters: embedded in the existing HTML, it avoids duplicating the page content in a separate JSON-LD block.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-01
Several plug-ins emitting the same markup type is one of the most common structured data problems: the duplicates can make an event details page look like a list of events and change how Google interprets the page.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-06
Schema.org, in which Google is a major participant, began publishing usage statistics for all its types and properties in 2026, showing in buckets how many domains use each one; the data is also in schema.org's GitHub repository.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Google often needs to see a markup type adopted on websites before it invests in a feature that uses it, a chicken-and-egg problem that the schema.org usage statistics are meant to help break.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Schema.org added support for RDF lists and sets, which give a way to express ordered values, because RDF triples are not ordered by nature.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Google announced server-side structured data validation as coming soon: it will publish downloadable validation rules in SHACL on each structured data feature guide, with other kinds of checks to follow.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-12glossary term SHACL
Google's planned validation workflow has five steps: download the rules from the feature guide, generate the JSON or embedded microdata or RDFa, run the rules against the generated server-side markup as a first check, deploy and test in the Rich Results Test, and monitor ongoing performance in Search Console.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence slide photo
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-12
The SHACL rules are meant to run inside a site's content generation, so markup is sanity-checked before it is published and does not silently regress later, a breakage site owners might otherwise discover only through a Search Console report.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-12glossary term SHACL
The SHACL rules will not replace Search Console as the canonical place for structured data reports, because some checks use Google's internal libraries and cannot be expressed in SHACL, but they will catch problems such as a missing required field.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-12
Google plans a SHACL rule set for each of its structured data feature types and will release the rule sets gradually once they have been checked.
Speaker Ryan LeveringEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SDA-12
Gary Illyes suggested a div with a CSS background image as a way to keep an image from being picked up by Google.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IMG-06
Of the attributes the HTML standard defines for the img element, Google uses three and ignores the rest; Gary Illyes named src and alt but not the third.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Gary Illyes ranked the alt attribute below src in importance, while saying alt attributes are still important.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Gary Illyes said the AVIF image format currently has hiccups and Google may have problems ingesting it, although it should technically be supported.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IMG-05
Gary Illyes cited a figure that more than 40% of Southeast Asian shoppers rely on videos to make purchase decisions.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Gary Illyes said over 219 million people in Southeast Asia consume content on or through YouTube daily (the daily scope was heard in two independent recordings but is not verified).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Gary Illyes said there are over 150 streaming apps in Southeast Asia.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google knows from experiments that when a video's thumbnail is wrong, the share of viewers who drop out at the start of the video is extremely high.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-03
Gary Illyes called the 'fast-loading pages' factor for video SEO a misnomer: what matters is that the video itself loads fast, because people no longer have the patience to wait for videos to load.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-06
Serving videos from a content delivery network (CDN) that loads them faster than the site's own server is a win for video SEO, Gary Illyes said.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-06
Google recommends the MP4 container for videos because of its browser and device compatibility.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-06
Encode videos with standard codecs, because some people will not be able to play videos that use unusual ones.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-06
For a video to be discovered it must be embedded prominently, above the fold; Gary Illyes said a video placed below the fold is not going to be indexed.
“If it's not above the fold, then you basically lost the game.”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-01
Video sitemaps are not critical but good to have, because Google ingests video sitemaps much more often than it can process HTML pages.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-04glossary term Video sitemap
Descriptive text around a video helps Google rank and retrieve the video.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-02
The more people talk about a site's videos, the more likely Google is to surface them in search results, so videos should be promoted.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google's media indexer processes the images and videos that feature extraction passes to it and attaches them to the URL of the page that hosts them.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Unlike a disallowed web page, whose bare URL can still appear in web results, a video blocked by robots.txt is not shown by its URL, because Google sees no good reason to show a video URL alone.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-VID-06
Gary Illyes said noimageindex also affects videos on the page, because Google has to index a video's thumbnail, which is an image.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-09glossary term noimageindex
Google serves AI-generated images and videos in search results when users are specifically looking for them.
“We will serve users AI-generated images and videos in search results if they are looking for them specifically.”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
The diffusion models that generate images were built to generate images, not text, so they are typically poor at rendering text inside an image.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IMG-08
Version 20 of the Screaming Frog SEO Spider, released in May 2024, was the first that could connect the crawler to ChatGPT through custom JavaScript, which let SEOs rewrite image alt text at scale.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
To test LLM-generated alt text before a rollout, a community speaker recommended running the crawler's custom JavaScript in Screaming Frog's List mode on a few chosen URLs and reviewing the generated alt text, instead of crawling the whole site in Spider mode.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IMG-02
A community speaker cited W3C guidance that, when cleaning a transcript, it is usually not appropriate to correct the speaker's grammar or other mistakes.
Speaker Patrick DomanicoEvidence transcript
Google annotates each page with only one language in the index.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Server location is not really a reliable country-targeting signal nowadays, so Google does not use it much; the recording is unclear on the word 'server'.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google usually understands non-English words typed 'in English' (probably meaning romanised, Latin-letter spellings, which the speaker did not spell out); the speaker said this belongs to query interpretation, a Day 3 (serving) subject.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Whether machine-translated content is acceptable depends on the case and is the site owner's decision, after weighing three things machine translation can miss: translation quality, local conventions and cultural adaptation.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-INT-10
Localisation should account for local conventions such as date formats, which differ between Europe, the UK, the US and other countries, and calendars (in Thailand the current year is 2569), or a date can point users to the wrong day.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirements DEV-INT-10, DEV-SDA-05
According to the speaker, shoppers in Europe and the US pay a lot of attention to promotions and discounts when deciding to buy (no source for this was captured), one of the cultural factors localisation should take into account.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
According to consumer data shown on a slide in the talk (source not captured), US consumers judge product quality more by user feedback and reviews, while European shoppers seem to look more at brand reputation.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
According to consumer data shown on a slide in the talk (source not captured), German shoppers also rely heavily on expert recommendations and certifications when judging product quality.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
According to consumer data shown on a slide in the talk (source not captured), French shoppers particularly want to know where a product comes from.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
A community speaker cited a Semrush study that found at least one hreflang error on 75% of multilingual websites; the study, reported in February 2017, audited 20,000 sites with several language versions (the speaker recalled it as about five years old).
Speaker Alizée BaudezEvidence transcript
Arabic and Persian contain letters that look identical to users but are different characters to software, with different Unicode code points; the example given was the letter ye, which has an Arabic and a Persian form.
Speaker a second community speakerEvidence transcript
Because Arabic and Persian lookalike letters have different code points, a searcher may type one variant of a word while a website's text uses the other.
Speaker a second community speakerEvidence transcript
Lookalike Arabic and Persian character variants cause problems for data analysis and keyword research: data for one term can be split across the variants, which makes keyword research less accurate.
Speaker a second community speakerEvidence transcript
Persian and Arabic are written right to left and English left to right, so a title that mixes the two scripts can display in a confusing, unpredictable order even when its content is correct.
Speaker a second community speakerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-INT-12glossary term Bidirectional text
The display problem of mixing right-to-left and left-to-right text also affects product titles and URLs, the presenter of the non-Latin-script talk said, showing an example from a large Iranian e-commerce site.
Speaker a second community speakerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-INT-12glossary term Bidirectional text
The presenter of the non-Latin-script talk said that in competitive Persian, Turkish and Arabic searches, bought backlinks and paid editorial content still visibly influence rankings and are widespread (an observation; no data was shown); the presenter stressed this described the situation and was not a recommendation.
Speaker a second community speakerEvidence transcript
Smaller languages have fewer documents on the web and so worse coverage, from an indexing perspective, than large ones, for example Basque compared with Spanish or Portuguese, Hungarian compared with German, and Sicilian compared with Italian.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google detects the language of each document and weights language in index selection so that the index is not dominated by one or two languages.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Without language or country input to index selection, Google's index would become an English index, because so many documents on the web are in English.
“if you just let the index decide what to rank without language or country input, then you would have an English index”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google also takes country into account in index selection, so that countries producing less content in a shared language, such as the UK for English or Switzerland for German, are not disadvantaged against the US or Germany, which produce most of it.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Freshness plays no big role in index selection: whether a page was published 30 years ago or today makes no difference to its chance of being indexed.
“It doesn't play a big role in index selection.”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Whether a page's content is explicit does not matter for indexing: judged on content type alone, an explicit page has the same chance of being indexed as a major news site's homepage.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google calculates SafeSearch signals during indexing rather than in ranking, because ranking happens online with no time for such calculations, while indexing has the processing power.
“In ranking, everything has to happen online, and there's just not enough time to calculate those things.”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
SpamBrain, Google's AI-based spam detection system, is nowadays built on Gemini and fine-tuned specifically for finding spam.
“built on top of, well, nowadays, Gemini, and fine-tuned to that specific purpose of finding spam”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term SpamBrain
SpamBrain was said to detect 5 times more spam sites than the spam algorithms Google had launched before it.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google gives two reasons for not indexing every URL it knows: most of them would not be useful to users, and including URLs in the index that users would never see would be an immense investment.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Index selection aims to index only documents that are useful to users now or potentially in the future.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Index selection is a predictive AI system that relies heavily on machine learning.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Index selection uses what Google already knows about a site: if the site, or even a section of it, satisfies users' needs well, new URLs from it are treated more forgivingly.
“the index selection system is going to be more forgiving when it sees a new URL from your site”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-URL-10
Index selection uses the signals calculated earlier in indexing for each document it has to select or discard.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Index selection
Index selection is the last step before documents enter Google's index.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Index selection
When Google's coverage of a country is limited, index selection becomes more likely to select documents relevant to that country, even if other signals would suggest otherwise.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
When Google lacks content in a language, such as Basque, index selection becomes more likely to select lower-quality documents in that language.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Under-served languages were presented as an opportunity: where Google's index holds a lot of spam in a language such as Basque, a site that starts publishing in that language can very likely replace that spam with its own content and rank for those keywords (one clause of the reasoning was inaudible).
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
The overall importance of a document or site plays a significant role in index selection.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
News sites were given as the example of importance at work in index selection: they are generally very important on the web and their pages usually get indexed very fast ('indexed' is a likely but not certain reading of the recording).
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
'Discovered – currently not indexed' in Search Console is a crawl-scheduling state: Google knows the URL exists but does not want to crawl it yet. Of the two not-indexed statuses discussed, it was called the 'kind of nastier' one.
“The first one is kind of nastier.”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-03glossary term Discovered – currently not indexed
'Crawled – currently not indexed' is most of the time a quality issue rather than a technical one: the pages are usually low quality or useless for the index, for example duplicates or soft 404s.
“most of the time it is actually a quality issue”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-03
The first thing to check for pages reported as 'Crawled – currently not indexed' is whether their quality is on par with the parts of the site that Google does index.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google's Search index stores the tokens produced by tokenizing each page, as they are, together with the metadata attached to the tokens during tokenization.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-HTM-07
Google's Search index does not hold the full content of pages; Google said storing full pages and pulling them out at serving time would be a very inefficient way of doing search.
“we don't have the full content of the page in our index”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
The snippet shown for a web result is reconstructed from the tokens stored in Google's index: Google knows the position of each token in the document and rebuilds the snippet from those positions.
“the snippet that you see was reconstructed from these tokens”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google said posting lists, which Google's serving system uses to find the pages that contain a query's words, are not new: they are at least 60 years old (as of 2026).
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
For most of the tokens Google finds on the web, though not every single one, the index keeps a posting list of the URLs that contain that token.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Posting list
In posting-list retrieval, the posting lists of the query's words are intersected, which yields an unranked list of candidate URLs.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Posting list
A search query is broken into words with the same segmenter or tokenizer that Google used to build the index.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
At retrieval, Google looks up the posting lists of the query words that are actually important rather than of every word in the query.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google said a vector space also holds embeddings for associations the web makes with a page, such as what is known about its author; most of them sit far from typical queries, and a query that names the association may move closer to them.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
The legacy Google Trends Explore page is still available but will be retired: Google is adding its features to the new Explore page until everyone can move to the new one (no date was given).
“the legacy Explore page, which is still available, but not for a long time”
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
A Google Trends Explore chart presented on stage put worldwide search interest in Gemini above ChatGPT for the first time ever in September 2025, during a sharp surge for Gemini.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google attributed the September 2025 surge in worldwide search interest for Gemini to the viral launch of Nano Banana (the image editing model in the Gemini app), as people searched for both Gemini and Nano Banana.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
After the Nano Banana surge faded, worldwide baseline search interest in Gemini stayed much higher than before, which Google read as a sustained gain in brand recognition.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
A Google Trends chart of worldwide search interest in AI from 2004 to mid-2025 showed a huge rise in the two to three years before mid-2025.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google said worldwide search interest in AI has climbed far higher since mid-2025, beyond the range of the 2004 to mid-2025 chart shown in the talk.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
An early-2012 worldwide spike in Google Trends search interest for 'ai' was caused by the global hit song 'Ai Se Eu Te Pego', whose title contains the Portuguese word 'ai', not by interest in artificial intelligence.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
A Google Trends engineer found the cause of the 2012 'ai' spike by zooming in on that time range on the Explore page and reading the related queries.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Worldwide Google Trends search interest for ski since 2004 shows strong seasonality, peaking every winter.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Worldwide Google Trends search interest for ski also shows a mostly steady decline since 2004, which can be misread as falling search volume.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google said its internal numbers show the actual volume of ski-related searches is going up, even though ski's share of all searches in Google Trends has declined since 2004.
“we can tell you from our own internal numbers that we're seeing on Google Trends: the actual volume is, in fact, going up.”
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
A Google Trends chart of US search interest over five years showed umbrella and sunscreen correlated, both peaking in June, against the common assumption that umbrella searches peak in winter.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google said journalists use Google Trends' Trending now every morning to find content gaps: topics people are searching for that their publication may need to cover.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google said the search terms returned by Google Trends' Suggest search terms are ranked by search interest.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google said colour maps of the geographic breakdown of search interest (regions within a country, or countries worldwide) had launched in the new Google Trends Explore page about a month before the October 2026 talk.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
The category filter of the legacy Google Trends Explore page has been reintroduced in the new Explore page.
Speaker Omri WeismanEvidence transcript
Google named Thai as a language that makes query understanding more complex because it does not separate words with spaces; the speaker added, hedging with 'apparently', that Thai uses spaces to separate sentences.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
After detecting the query language and separating the words, Google removes words it thinks matter little to the query, such as 'a' and 'of', known as stop words.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byglossary terms Query understanding, Stop words
Google's query processing deliberately mirrors indexing: a query is transformed into something that can be matched against the index, and stop word removal is part of that transformation.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
For some searches the stop words are important, and Google then tries to recognise the whole phrase, stop words included, as an entity; in indexing, such words are indexed together.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Stop words
When a query names an entity, Google treats it as a request for that entity rather than as a collection of separate words.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Query understanding
In ranking, Google can match a query's words or its entity, and, the speaker said with a 'probably', mixes both to some degree.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
In Google's example, the query word 'photograph' could be expanded to 'image', 'picture' or 'photo', but one German candidate had to be dropped because the similar German word means 'photographer', so expansions are language-specific.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
For technical terms, Google's synonym swapping can return either a technical page or a simplified page for the same query.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google suggested a test: a search that lists a term's synonyms joined with OR will probably return results very similar to the plain query, because Google adds the synonyms itself (part of the sentence is unclear in the recording).
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Internally, a short query can turn into a much longer rewritten query, because Google adds entities, synonyms and other information before looking it up.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
In Google's rewrite example, [fried chicken place in Barcelona] keeps 'fried' and 'chicken' as two words, may add an entity for fried chicken, and replaces 'place' with alternatives such as 'area', 'location' or 'restaurant'.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Some alternatives in a rewritten query make no sense, such as 'fried chicken area in Barcelona', which is harmless because few indexed pages match them.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
In a rewritten query, a place name such as Barcelona can stay a word or be swapped for an entity, possibly a more specific location.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Some synonyms are contextual and depend on the rest of the query: 'GM' probably means General Motors in [GM car], general manager in [GM restaurants] and genetically modified in [GM barley].
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google's synonyms need not be synonyms linguistically: words people use interchangeably are treated as synonyms, because the aim is to find the right content in the index.
“we don't need to be technically accurate”
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Synonyms and siblings
When Google highlights a word in its results that looks like the wrong synonym, the reason is probably that many people use the two words interchangeably.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Besides synonyms, Google detects 'siblings', words in the same category that are related but not interchangeable, such as Canon and Nikon.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Synonyms and siblings
Because Canon and Nikon are siblings rather than synonyms, a search for [Canon camera] should not show Nikon cameras.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Synonyms and siblings
Google learns synonyms and siblings from search behaviour: words people search with in the same way become synonyms, while frequent comparison queries mark words as not interchangeable (the end of the sentence is unclear in the recording).
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
To check whether Google treats two terms as the same, search for each: [Iberico ham] and [jamón ibérico] both brought up the same entity, so Google understands them as the same thing.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
At the time of the talk, a search for [Spanish cured ham] brought up mainly a Wikipedia page, showing that Google does not automatically equate that phrase with Iberico ham.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google sometimes gets diacritic variants wrong, so it is worth searching to see whether Google understands a variant; if it does, pick one spelling and use it.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Users expect content written the way they search: in some languages they search in Latin characters, in others in the local script, and Hindi users, for example, search both in Hindi and in Latin letters.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-INT-11
Google said a short video showing how one query is expanded into several fan-out queries has been in its documentation for a while.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Google said fan-out queries are not added to Search Console, because Google considers them part of its infrastructure.
“Fan-out queries are not added in Search Console, because they're basically a part of our infrastructure.”
Speaker John MuellerEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-AIF-03glossary term Query fan-out
Google's summary slide on query understanding said Google's synonyms are not always language-based; on stage this was explained as words people use interchangeably counting as synonyms even when they are not synonyms linguistically.
“Google's synonyms aren't always language-based”
Wording checked against the slide or recording
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's summary slide on query understanding noted that some languages do not use spaces between words, which complicates query understanding.
Speaker John MuellerEvidence slide photo, transcript
At retrieval, Google splits the query into words, applies query understanding and expansion, and matches the words and their expansions against the posting lists.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Retrieval
Because a query like [best fried chicken ever] can match millions of pages, Google already orders the candidates during retrieval, before ranking starts.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google called quality the most important of the signals used to order candidates at retrieval: a URL of high quality is more likely to be retrieved from the index for specific queries.
“if the quality of a URL is high, then it's more likely to be retrieved from the index for specific queries.”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Retrieval
A community speaker recalled that around 2009 writers bent titles and phrases to include a keyword because their CMS counted keyword density, and said that hitting the ratio really worked at the time.
Speaker Community speakersEvidence transcript
A community speaker compared Googlebot to an inspector who cannot enter the shop and only looks through the window, seeing the page as ones and zeros, which the speaker linked to tokenization.
Speaker Community speakersEvidence transcript
Google's quality talk described quality as a ranking signal in its own right: a number calculated from many different parts (the word 'quality' is a repaired speech-to-text reading).
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google's quality talk called PageRank the speaker's favourite ranking system, elegant in its time, but said Google does not really use it so much anymore.
“My favorite is probably PageRank, even though we don't really use them so much anymore.”
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google's quality talk said search quality raters can be employed by other search engines too, not just by Google.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google's quality talk said a big portion of the new pages Google discovers every day is spam, adding that the speaker did not know of Google ever publishing the percentage.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
The speaker opened the talk on why Search changes by noting that Google's logo has changed only a handful of times in about 30 years.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google's slide said that in 2023 Google ran more than 800,000 search quality tests; the speaker added that a more recent figure might exist.
Speaker GoogleEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's slide gave three reasons why Search changes: new content formats, the growing breadth of content on the web, and content issues such as spam.
Speaker GoogleEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's slide said that as content formats and types become more widespread, search users might start looking for them, and if enough people become interested Google might launch one or more Search features for those formats.
Speaker GoogleEvidence slide photo, transcript
Compared with the simple early-2000s Google results page, which showed a few expected sites, today's results page for the same query adds exploration features such as People Also Ask.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google added exploration features to its results pages because users' behaviour evolved: people wanted to explore more of the topic they were searching for.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
The speaker said that without new Search features, search results would become obsolete and users would no longer find them useful.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
In the mid-1990s the web was small enough to list in one manually edited directory; by the time BackRub was being built, directories could no longer find information on the growing web, which is why Google was created.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
The speaker said the web keeps growing exponentially and named AI slop, low-quality AI-generated content, as one of the reasons.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term AI slop
To show how much the web has grown, Google's deck compared result counts for the query 'durian': for every result in 2000 there were about 20,000 results in 2025.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
Google sometimes couples a core update with an update to its Search Quality Rater Guidelines.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
To improve a site after a core update, check whether users can complete their information journey on the site and ask users directly, for example with customer satisfaction (CSAT) surveys, then improve based on the answers.
Speaker GoogleEvidence transcript
In the speaker's view, some of the egregious spam methods on the slide (cloaking, doorways, scraped content, link spam and hacked content) are not that common anymore or no longer matter much to Google.
“Some of these, I would say, are not that common anymore, or we don't care all that much about them.”
Speaker GoogleEvidence slide photo, transcript
Reviewing the spam slide, the speaker said link spam would probably be replaced with scaled content abuse as the spam type worth talking about today.
Speaker GoogleEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SPM-02
Google described its search results page as an auction system in which the individual results, of different types, all bid for a place on the page; the auction is a metaphor for result types competing for space, not a reference to ads.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Text results are the most common and most prominent result type on Google's results page, whether they are generated by an LLM or not, or enhanced in some other way, Google's speaker said.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google said it shows images on the web results page, not only in image search, because from 2005-2006 it saw people appending words such as 'pictures' or 'images' to their queries, which led to the launch of universal search.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Universal search
Google handles an image used as a search query much like a text query interpreted as an embedding: the image is broken down into vectors (embeddings) that are then searched for in the index.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google can still detect intent for image queries, even though they are searched as embeddings, the speaker said.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Some search features work the other way round: a feature container holds text results inside it; the speaker could not recall that feature's name and suggested, unsure, linked subscriptions.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Image results shown among web results come from Google's image index and are roughly the same images that Google Images shows for the same query.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google said users rely quite a bit on review stars, calling them a powerful signal of quality and trust for users and a way for sites to use social proof to increase clicks.
“Those little yellow stars are a powerful signal of quality and trust for our users.”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Some countries rely a lot on social proof such as reviews, Google's speaker said, recalling a point from Google's Day 2 internationalisation talk.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google's Merchant Center feed specification is how millions of merchants send Google billions of product offers, which are used in Shopping ads, Search ads and organic search results.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Merchant Center
Schema.org product markup on websites is another source of billions of product offers for Google Shopping, next to merchant feeds.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Product data quality matters more than ever for AI ('garbage in, garbage out'), and even more for agents acting on behalf of consumers, because an agent with bad data cannot do the right thing.
“If the agent has bad data, it cannot do the right things.”
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Google decided against adding hundreds of thousands of highly specific feed attributes, such as heel height for shoes or lens details for cameras, and instead added a few flexible ones that leave merchants in control.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Google Shopping said highly prescriptive product data is a lot of hard work for merchants and is no longer needed for LLMs.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Google Shopping called rich data with light structure the AI sweet spot: a little structure that helps the AI system understand the data, not deep, highly nested, complex structures.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Some structure is much better than none for AI systems, because without structure the model does not really know what is going on, Google Shopping said.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Most of the new conversational feed attributes were already available in schema.org, so Google ties them back to structured data and can use them from product markup as well as from feeds.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SHP-04
Product Q&A can be marked up in schema.org by linking Question items, each with an acceptedAnswer of type Answer, to the product through the subjectOf property, because the product is the subject of the Q&A.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SHP-04
A recent schema.org release added two properties, specification and valueGroup, so that the Merchant Center product detail attribute can be expressed in schema.org, with product specs nested under specification.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SHP-04
Rich, lightly structured information is critical to AI systems: product data with many levels of nesting is not needed, but some structure is very important.
“rich, lightly structured information is critical to AI systems.”
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Rich, less structured product data that is not prescribed by Google, schema.org or any feed or data model is increasingly important, because the merchant or brand knows best what to provide.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
The bar for product data quality is higher than ever because agents and users need correct information: with wrong data an agent might buy the wrong product for a user.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Google Shopping named the downside of adding Q&As and documentation to product markup: the page's markup becomes somewhat bigger.
Speaker Alex JansenEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-SHP-04
Google named granularity as a design challenge of query groups: putting many queries into one large group versus splitting them into smaller, more specific groups.
Speaker Ariel KroszynskiEvidence transcript
Google acknowledged that query grouping is not perfect: some queries are not understood, and some are not grouped in a logical way.
Speaker Ariel KroszynskiEvidence transcript
Google said requests to Search Console's AI-powered configuration can be written in any language, not only English.
Speaker Ariel KroszynskiEvidence transcript
Google said it is working on adding more platforms to Search Console's platform properties beyond Instagram, TikTok, X and YouTube.
Speaker Ariel KroszynskiEvidence transcript
In the example YouTube report shown in Google's Search Console talk, long-form videos still got more traffic and more impressions from Google than Shorts; this was one example channel, not a general finding.
Speaker Ariel KroszynskiEvidence transcript
Nik Vujic said that after a page is published, the queries it appears for are the first thing to show up in Search Console, while clicks and impressions come much later.
Speaker Nik VujicEvidence transcript
Nik Vujic said Google loves fresh, quality content, as a reason for large sites to refresh their content.
Speaker Nik VujicEvidence transcript
Nik Vujic said Google Tag Manager events can be used to follow real traffic arriving from different LLMs.
Speaker Nik VujicEvidence transcript
A community speaker said most people in the room had probably seen clicks decline over the past couple of years because AI now takes part of the demand by summarising information from websites, a shift that hit informational queries first.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
In data a community speaker tracks for particular brands, local search terms have started to lose clicks too as AI features appear on more results pages.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
A community speaker reported, calling it worrying, that AI features have started to appear more often on results pages for commercial search terms too, in data the speaker tracks for particular brands.
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
A community speaker cited a recent Similarweb study as showing that being recommended in AI-driven services multiplies a brand's chance of getting traffic downstream; a Similarweb study reported in June 2026, probably the one meant, found brands recommended by ChatGPT 2.5 times more likely to get a site visit within 7 days (US desktop data, finance, travel and beauty).
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
A community speaker cited a study from about 10 years ago, repeated since, as finding that 82% of people clicked on a brand they already knew regardless of its position; the matching source is Red C's eye-tracking study of shopping-type searches, reported by Econsultancy in October 2018 (about eight years before the event).
Speaker not identifiedEvidence transcript
Google's research on how AI changes consumer purchase decisions, presented in October 2026, was based on 23,000 conversations with consumers (the talk did not say in which countries).
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Because people do not always do what they say they will do, Google's research on AI and purchase decisions also analysed panels with 40,000 participants, together with research partners, besides the consumer conversations (the talk did not make clear whether 40,000 is one panel or the total).
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Google's headline finding was that people who use AI features such as AI Mode or AI Overviews feel much more confident about their purchase decisions.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Google's research found that consumers delegate the mental effort of a purchase decision to AI without surrendering the choice itself, which Google calls being 'boosted'.
“that doesn't mean they are surrendering their choices. What's happening is that consumers are feeling boosted.”
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Boosted consumers
According to Google's research, AI turns consumers who were confused and overwhelmed by information and options into consumers who feel empowered, like category experts, and able to make the best purchase for their needs.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
The first benefit consumers get from AI, according to Google's research, is ease: AI synthesises information quickly into an easy-to-digest form and makes choice overload manageable, so consumers can offload cognitive effort.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Boosted consumers
Google's research also counted easy access as part of AI's ease benefit: multimodal input, such as taking pictures, and low friction lower the barrier to entry.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
The second benefit, assistance, is that AI reduces a complex category, such as smartphones or trip planning, to the few features that really matter (for a phone, the battery and the picture quality), so consumers feel like experts.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Boosted consumers
Assistance also includes showing consumers what people in similar situations chose, because people are social and want that reassurance (the wording of this passage is partly uncertain in the recording).
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Google's research found that consumers who do not use AI pinball between exploration and evaluation, while AI users start a purchase journey mostly exploring and then move on to evaluating, a path that looks more like a funnel.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
The third benefit, suggestion, is that AI often proposes ideas, brands and products a consumer had not thought of, which lowers the cost of curiosity.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Boosted consumers
Google's research found that people who use AI also visit more brand websites, because it is simply easier.
“the people that are using AI, they search more, and they also visit more websites of brands.”
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
AI users sometimes take even longer purchase journeys, but they perceive their journeys as shorter, a perception the data does not always support (part of this passage is uncertain in the recording).
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
For high-risk or high-involvement purchases, ease, assistance and suggestion are often not enough, and consumers add a reassurance step to reduce the risk of the decision.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
After exploring with AI, people often go back to Google Search and to the websites of the product or service providers to double-check before buying, for example trust in the company and cancellation policies.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
A new or less familiar brand should expect people to double-check it and should prepare assets that give them the extra reassurance they need at that last step.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
A Google slide showed nine Google Trends charts of trust-checking searches in several markets and languages (source line: Google Trends, January 2016 to March 2026, web search), all rising toward the end of the range: 'is [brand] legit?' (two panels), '[brand] è affidabile?', '[brand] jest bezpieczne?', 'Is [brand] betrouwbaar?', 'Ist [brand] seriös?', '[brand] est fiable?', '¿es [brand] falso?' and 'trustpilot'.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence slide photo
Google Trends shows a rise since about 2020 in searches of the form 'is [brand] legit', in the UK and in most other countries Google looked at.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript, slide photo
Consumers who use AI no longer feel frustrated by a lack of progress in a purchase decision; they feel they are moving through the funnel and feel like category experts.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Consumers boosted by AI in their purchase decisions were still a small group in October 2026, but the group is growing as more people start using AI (the word 'boosted' is an uncertain reading at this point of the recording).
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence transcript
Google's slide advised partnering with category opinion formers, such as YouTube creators, experts and institutions, who can give consumers extra reassurance.
Speaker Pablo PérezEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google estimated that discovering a new URL takes about 20 hours on average across all sites it knows of, with a minimum of seconds.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence 2 slide photos, transcript
Google said it knows hundreds of trillions of URLs (as of October 2026).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google estimated that refreshing (recrawling) a known URL takes about 30 days on average, with a minimum of seconds and an end point of weeks to never.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's index drops URLs that have not been recrawled for a very long time, which is the 'never' end of the refresh estimate.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
For news sites in particular, Google said the refresh of a known URL can literally take seconds (the reading 'news sites' is likely but not certain).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google estimated that processing a sitemap takes about 24 hours on average, with a minimum of minutes.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
If a sitemap is useful to Google and the site is of high quality, Google tries to refetch the sitemap within 14 days at most.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google's crawl chart puts a crawl capacity update at seconds when backing off, typically 4 hours or 1-2 weeks, and 1-3 weeks in recovery.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
A continuously running process recalculates each site's crawl capacity within a month, so a capacity change takes up to about a month at most.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google estimated that a crawl demand update driven by Search takes about 20 hours on average, with a minimum of minutes and an end point of weeks to months.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Gary Illyes said Google keeps saying it renders every URL on the internet and that he would say this is not true, though it is what he was told; he went on to say that Google's logs show the rendering queue cleared within weeks.
“we keep saying that we render every single URL on the internet. I would say that that's not true”
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-REN-01
According to Google's logs, everything in the rendering queue gets rendered within weeks.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Used byglossary term Render queue
Google estimated that meta annotations, such as robots meta tags, are processed in typically 45 to 90 minutes, with a minimum of 200 seconds (about three minutes) and an end point of 1 to 4 days.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Meta annotation processing is a critical step of indexing: until a document passes it, Google cannot go on indexing the document.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google estimated that link annotations are processed in minutes to 1-3 weeks, with an end point of about one year on the slide.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google estimated that indexing a document end to end takes about 1.5 hours on average, with a minimum of seconds.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google defined indexing end to end as the time from a document entering indexing until its critical processes finish and it reaches the serving index, tokenized and ready to be served as a result.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google usually picks up structured data updates within hours to one or two weeks, sometimes immediately.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-MON-10
Google indexes images in hours to two days on average, and the fastest it can reliably index an image is under 150 seconds.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google tries to index images from news sites much faster than usual, which lowers the average image indexing time (the reading 'news sites' is likely but not certain).
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google's deep analysis of a video, needed to actually understand it, can take months to finish.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Search Console removals average about 2 hours because Google pushes removals out to its serving system about every 2 hours.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byrequirement DEV-IDX-13
Google estimated that a snippet update takes 1-2 days on average and up to several weeks to months, because the page has to be reprocessed to extract the new text.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google estimated that updating the image shown with a text result takes 1-2 weeks on average, from a minimum of days up to several weeks to months.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
The image shown with a text result changes only after the image itself is indexed or reindexed and then goes through a further processing step involving embeddings.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google estimated that a core update affects a site within 2 to 4 weeks from the beginning of its rollout.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence slide photo, transcript
Google described AI as an umbrella of many technologies working together, one of which is machine learning: systems that learn from large amounts of data to make informed decisions.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Gary Illyes said machine learning is about 50 years old and that Google has been using it for 'probably 30 years', starting with statistical models that made the 'Did you mean' feature possible.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google described large language models as deep learning on internet-scale data sets, trained so that the model has an internal vector space in which concepts are mapped by context.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Google distinguished predictive language models, whose primary job is to predict the next word or words in a text, from generative models that produce output from a prompt; next-word prediction is a guess, made with some accuracy, from the context given.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Adding grounding or retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) on top of a model reduces hallucinations but cannot eliminate them.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript
Used byglossary term Hallucination
Search has changed every year since its start, for example the Florida update in 2003 (before core updates existed), Universal Search and the Knowledge Graph.
Speaker Gary IllyesEvidence transcript